P.S: SINCE I HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO CHANGE MY LANGUAGE SETTING FROM KOREAN TO ENGLISH, I WILL TELL YOU WHAT TO CLICK. IN ORDER TO POST COMMENT, CLICK "0개의 답글" . (Notice the number "0". It can change to any numbers such as 1 or 2. AFTER YOU WRITE YOUR COMMENT, CLICK "답글 달기
Book Review
Book Review
Battle-zone absurdity and adrenaline-fueled folly
By Michiko Kakutani
Published on 3/14/11
Book: The Taliban Shuffle by Kim Barker
Battle-zone absurdity and adrenaline-fueled folly by Michiko Kakutani is about commenting on the book, “The Taliban Shuffle” by Kim Barker, states how it manages to describe Afghanistan situation as hilarious by using literary techniques such as diction, language, and Syntax. Kakutani describes the book as “oxymoron”, which states that the book is eccentric for its humor rather than seriousness about the topic: war in Afghanistan . In addition, she states that in 2003, Taliban used “recalcitrant donkeys as a suicide bombers”, which seems hilarious. By using diction, Kakutani was able to make the serious topic such as Afghanistan one into the funny one.
Syntax is among the literary techniques “Black humor…is a perfect tool for capturing the sad-awful-frequently-insane incongruities of war”. By using “-“frequently, she was able to make negative words sound like hilarious ones by putting them all together, making it less serious.
At last, language is used by Kakutani to makeAfghanistan war sound funnier than it should be. She also stated that the war “ke[pt] hopping”, making readers think war as a some kind of animal, like a bunny. By doing personification, she was able to make war sound like a bunny, thus making it less serious and more entertaining.
The critical perspective of this work seems to be Formalism for it only focuses on the book that Kakutani wrote, not author’s background or the history of the world. I have discovered the connection between this and other course material or readings that I have had in the past. When I was a Freshman, I was in theU.S. history class. In there, I learned about the Vietnam War. I learned that rarely solders were held accountable for anything and that there were no rules. In addition, I remember learning that the South Vietnam government was corrupt. In current Afghanistan , exact same thing is happening: corrupt government, no rules, no justice. I want to praise Kakutani for writing a very critical yet funny book review. I enjoyed it very much. Good job!
Syntax is among the literary techniques “Black humor…is a perfect tool for capturing the sad-awful-frequently-insane incongruities of war”. By using “-“frequently, she was able to make negative words sound like hilarious ones by putting them all together, making it less serious.
At last, language is used by Kakutani to make
The critical perspective of this work seems to be Formalism for it only focuses on the book that Kakutani wrote, not author’s background or the history of the world. I have discovered the connection between this and other course material or readings that I have had in the past. When I was a Freshman, I was in the
Pass.
답글삭제You really need to watch your grammar. "By using these dictions" is incorrect usage. So is "he stated that the war was “keep hopping”, ". Aside from that, good analysis.
PASS. I agree with Dan; you need to watch your grammar. Also, next time break this up into paragraphs so it's easier to read. If there was a next time... :)
답글삭제Pass. Good job, I agree with Meg that if you split it up into paragraphs it would be more organized and easier to read.
답글삭제